ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2002
Superiority of a functional leukocyte adhesiveness/aggregation test over the white blood cell count to discriminate between mild and significant inflammatory response in patients with acute bacterial infections.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic cell counters may underestimate the white blood cell count (WBCC) in the presence of aggregated leukocytes. In the present study we focused on the possibility of using a functional, as opposed to an anatomic, count to circumvent this eventual underestimation. A model of bacterial infection was used because of the importance of leukocytosis in the physician's clinical decision-making process. There were 35 patients with low C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations (0.5-4.9 mg/dL), 45 with intermediate (5-9.9 mg/dL), and 120 with relatively high (>10 mg/dL) CRP concentrations. A significant (P=0.008) difference was noted between the state of leukocyte adhesiveness/aggregation in the peripheral blood of individuals with low CRP concentrations (3.5%+/-4.3%) and those with high CRP concentrations (7.4%+/-8%), while there was no significant difference in the respective number of WBCs per cubic millimeter (cmm) (11,600 +/- 5,500 and 14,000 +/- 7,200, respectively). We raise the possibility that a functional test might be superior over an anatomic count in patients with acute bacterial infection and a significant acute phase response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.