ReviewDrugs2002
Gene therapy for restenosis: current status.
Review in Drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoparticle drug- and gene-eluting stents for the prevention and treatment of coronary restenosis.Theranostics · 2014Review
- Polyelectrolyte multilayers promote stent-mediated delivery of DNA to vascular tissue.Biomacromolecules · 2013Article
- Nanoparticulate carriers for the treatment of coronary restenosis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2007Review
- Applied gene therapy in preclinical models of vascular injury.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2003Review
- Nonneurotropic adenovirus: a vector for gene transfer to the brain and gene therapy of neurological disorders.International review of neurobiology · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atherosclerosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Western world. Vascular occlusion caused by atherosclerosis usually requires invasive treatment, such as surgical bypass or angioplasty. However, bypass graft failure and restenosis limit the usefulness of these procedures, with 20% of patients needing a new revascularisation procedure within 6 months of angioplasty. Numerous pharmacological agents have been investigated for the prevention of restenosis but none has shown undisputed efficacy in clinical medicine. Gene transfer offers a novel approach to the treatment of restenosis because of easy accessibility of vessels and already existing gene delivery methods. It can be used to overexpress therapeutically important proteins locally without high systemic toxicity, and the therapeutic effect can be targeted to a particular pathophysiological event. Promising results have been obtained from many pre-clinical experiments using therapeutic genes or oligonucleotides to prevent restenosis. Early clinical trials have shown that plasmid- and adenovirus-mediated vascular gene transfers can be conducted safely and are well tolerated. Ex vivo gene therapy with E2F-decoy succeeded in reducing graft occlusion rate after surgical bypass in a randomised, double-blind clinical trial. In the future, further development of gene delivery methods and vectors is needed to improve the efficacy and safety of gene therapy. Also, better knowledge of vascular biology at the molecular level is needed to find optimal strategies and gene combinations to treat restenosis. Provided that these difficulties can be solved, gene therapy offers an enormous potential for clinical medicine in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.