Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12109875›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2002

Microarray technology and its application on nicotine research.

Ming D Li, Ozien Konu, Justin K Kane, Kevin G Becker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ming D LiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis 38163, USA. mdli@utmem.edu
Ozien Konu
Justin K Kane
Kevin G Becker
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS DA-12844NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA13783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its development, microarray technique has revolutionized almost all fields of biomedical research by enabling high-throughput gene expression profiling. Using cDNA microarrays, thousands of genes from various organisms have been examined with respect to differentiation/development, disease diagnosis, and drug discovery Nevertheless, research on nicotine using cDNA microarrays has been rather limited. Therefore, it is our intention in this article to report the findings of our cDNA microarray study on nicotine. We first present an overview of the microarray technology, particularly focusing on the factors related to microarray design and analysis. Second, we provide a detailed description of several newly identified biological pathways in our laboratory, such as phosphatidylinositol signaling and calcium homeostasis, which are involved in response to chronic nicotine administration. Additionally, we illustrate how comparisons between microarray studies help identify candidate genes that potentially may explain the observed inverse association between smoking and schizophrenia. Lastly, given the early stage of microarray research on nicotine, we elaborate on the need for an efficient analysis of genetic networks to further enhance our understanding of the mechanisms involved in nicotine abuse and addiction.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain ChemistryGene ExpressionHumansNeuroprotective AgentsNicotineOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSchizophreniaSignal TransductionTobacco Use DisorderNeuroprotective AgentsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID12109875
OpenAlexW2035555949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.