Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12102547›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2002

Back to the future: antibody-based strategies for the treatment of infectious diseases.

H Barbaros Oral, Cüneyt Ozakin, Cezmi A Akdiş

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A simple model for assessment of anti-toxin antibodies.BioMed research international · 2013
    Article
  3. A reaction-diffusion model of the receptor-toxin-antibody interaction.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2011
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H Barbaros OralDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. oralb@uludag.edu.tr
Cüneyt Ozakin
Cezmi A Akdiş
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before antibiotics, sera from immune animals and humans were used to treat a variety of infectious diseases, often with successful results. After the discovery of antimicrobial agents, serum therapy for bacterial infections was rapidly forsaken. In the last two decades, problems with treatment of newly emerged, re-emerged, or persistent infectious diseases necessitated researchers to develop new and/or improved antibody-based therapeutic approaches. This article reviews some information on the use of antibodies for the treatment of infectious diseases, with special reference to the most seminal discoveries and current advances as well as available treatment approaches in this field.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralBacterial InfectionsHumansImmunotherapyInfectionsVirus DiseasesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID12102547
OpenAlexW2169114281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.