Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12101126›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2002

Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts.

Tamara L Peoples, Eric Dean, Oscar Gonzalez, Lindsey Lambourne, Sean M Burgess

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA Helicase Mph1Developmental cell · 2020
    Article
  7. The cohesin complex in mammalian meiosis.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  11. Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  12. Mismatch repair during homologous and homeologous recombination.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  13. Synaptonemal complex extension from clustered telomeres mediates full-length chromosome pairing in Schmidtea mediterranea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2013
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The tricky path to recombining X and Y chromosomes in meiosis.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara L PeoplesSection of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Eric Dean
Oscar Gonzalez
Lindsey Lambourne
Sean M Burgess
University of California, Davis · USInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A site-specific recombination system that probes the relative probabilities that pairs of chromosomal loci collide with one another in living cells of budding yeast was used to explore the relative contributions of pairing, recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and telomere clustering to the close juxtaposition of homologous chromosome pairs during meiosis. The level of Cre-mediated recombination between a pair of loxP sites located at an allelic position on homologous chromosomes was 13-fold greater than that between a pair of loxP sites located at ectopic positions on nonhomologous chromosomes. Mutations affecting meiotic recombination initiation and the processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) into single-end invasions (SEIs) reduced the levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination levels by three- to sixfold. The severity of Cre/loxP phenotypes is presented in contrast to relatively weak DSB-independent pairing defects as assayed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for these mutants. Mutations affecting synaptonemal complex (SC) formation or crossover control gave wild-type levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination. A delay in attaining maximum levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination was observed for a mutant defective in telomere clustering. None of the mutants affected ectopic levels of recombination. These data suggest that stable, close homolog juxtaposition in yeast is distinct from pre-DSB pairing interactions, requires both DSB and SEI formation, but does not depend on crossovers or SC.

Indexed as

Chromosome PairingRecombination, GeneticAllelesChromosome MappingChromosomes, FungalMeiosisSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID12101126
PMCPMC186361
OpenAlexW2118064539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.