ArticleDrug safety2002
Therapeutic ineffectiveness: heads or tails?
Article in Drug safety, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative disproportionality signals for methotrexate monotherapy versus methotrexate combined with hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: newly highlighted signals evaluated using drug information safety profiles.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance of suspected or confirmed therapeutic ineffectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapy: extent, associated factors, challenges and solutions to reporting.Malaria journal · 2020Article
- Paradoxical adverse drug reactions: descriptive analysis of French reports.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Characteristics and trends of spontaneous reporting of therapeutic ineffectiveness in South Korea from 2000 to 2016.PloS one · 2019Article
- Semantic categories and relations for modelling adverse drug reactions towards a categorial structure for pharmacovigilance.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2008Article
- Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in Cuba: integrating continuous education, training and research in a network approach.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2002Article
- Drug Therapeutic Failures as a Cause of Admission to an Intensive Care Unit at a University Hospital.Journal of research in pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reporting of therapeutic ineffectiveness through adverse drug reaction spontaneous reporting systems has been proposed by some authors. In the WHO Adverse Reactions Terminology (WHO-ART) and Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology, the term therapeutic ineffectiveness includes drug interactions, resistance, tolerance and tachyphylaxis, as well as pharmaceutical defects such as substandard, adulterated, and counterfeit drugs. Under certain circumstances, reporting therapeutic ineffectiveness may contribute to identifying pharmaceutical defects. However, the best approach to avoid their occurrence would be implementing good manufacturing practices and strengthening quality control activities. This would prevent the misuse of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (e.g. when reporting of therapeutic ineffectiveness is 'suggested' by interested parties, especially when a generic product has been substituted for a branded original product).
Indexed as
Identifiers
12093306What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.