Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12092863›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2002

Peri-operative fluid and electrolyte management: a survey of consultant surgeons in the UK.

D N Lobo, M G Dube, K R Neal, S P Allison, B J Rowlands

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Learning to prescribe intravenous fluids: A scoping review.Perspectives on medical education · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. 0.9% saline is neither normal nor physiological.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fluid balance and acute kidney injury.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2010
    Review
  18. Substantial variation of both opinions and practice regarding perioperative fluid resuscitation.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2009
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D N LoboSection of Surgery, University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. dileep.lobo@nottingham.ac.uk
M G Dube
K R Neal
S P Allison
B J Rowlands

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent peri-operative fluid and electrolyte management in the UK may be suboptimal. We assessed the attitudes of consultant surgeons to fluid and electrolyte prescribing and gathered suggestions for improvement in education on the subject.

methodsA postal questionnaire survey was sent to 1091 Fellows of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. Of the 730 (67%) replies, 20 were invalid or incomplete, and 710 (65%) questionnaires were analysed. Outcome measures included provision of guidelines and teaching to junior staff on fluid and electrolyte prescribing, appropriateness of fluid management and suggestions to improve standards.

resultsJunior staff were given written guidelines in 22% of instances. Only 16% of respondents felt that their preregistration house officers (PRHOs) were adequately trained in the subject before joining the firm; 15% also stated that PRHOs did not receive much training on their firm. 65% felt that fluid balance charts were accurately maintained, nursing shortages being the commonest reason for inaccuracies. Only 30% felt that postoperative patients were receiving appropriate amounts of water, sodium and potassium. Respondents who had been consultants for > 5 years were more likely to prefer erring on the side of under-replacement of fluid than those who were consultants for 5 years (63% versus 47%, P < 0.0005). Suggestions for improvement in education included problem-oriented ward rounds, written guidelines, and discussion of patient scenarios.

conclusionsConsultant surgeons feel that present practice in peri-operative fluid management is unsatisfactory. Higher standards within clinical governance and risk management may be achieved by focused practical training combined with formal written guidelines.

Indexed as

ElectrolytesGeneral SurgeryProfessional PracticeAttitude of Health PersonnelFluid TherapyHumansIntraoperative CareMedical Staff, HospitalSurveys and QuestionnairesElectrolytes

Identifiers

PMID12092863
PMCPMC2503821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.