Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12089471›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2002

An insight into the possible mechanism of working of two-cistronic gene expression systems and rational designing of newer systems.

Utpal Kumar Mukhopadhyay, Girish Sahni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Utpal Kumar MukhopadhyayInstitute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chadigarh 160 036, India.
Girish Sahni
Institute of Microbial Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initial attempts at hyper-expressing buffalo/goat growth hormone (GH)-ORFs in Escherichia coli directly under various strong promoters were not successful despite the presence of a functional gene. High level expression of GH was achieved as a fusion protein with glutathione-S-transferase (GST). To produce native GH in an unfused state, we adapted an established strategy of two-cistronic approach in our system. In this strategy, utilizing one of the highly efficient reported sequences as the first cistron led to a nearly 1000-fold enhancement in the level of expression under an E. coli promoter (trc). In search of a newer first-cistron sequence as well as to see the generality of the two-cistronic approach, we explored the ability of different lengths of a highly expressing natural gene to act as an efficient first cistron. Surprisingly, GST, which is naturally highly expressible in E. coli, could not be fitted into a successful two-cistronic construct. In addition, placement of the entire two-cistronic expression cassette (which had earlier given high-level GH expression under trc promoter) under the T7 promoter in E. coli failed to hyper-express GH. These results suggest that the successful exploitation of the two-cistron arrangement for hyper-expression of eukaryotic ORFs in bacteria is not as straightforward as was previously thought. It appears probable that factors such as the sequence context, together with the length and codons used in the first cistron are important as well.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceBlotting, WesternBuffaloesEscherichia coliGenesGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsGoatsGrowth HormoneMolecular Sequence DataProtein BiosynthesisGrowth Hormone

Identifiers

PMID12089471
OpenAlexW2061965613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.