Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12087464›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2002

Prognostic impact of chromosomal aberrations in Ewing tumours.

C M Hattinger, U Pötschger, M Tarkkanen, J Squire, M Zielenska, S Kiuru-Kuhlefelt, L Kager, P Thorner, S Knuutila, F K Niggli and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Characterization Informs Prognosis in Patients With Localized Ewing Sarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Ewing Sarcoma Tumors Demonstrates Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Clonal Evolution.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Complex/crypticGenes · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review: Ewing Sarcoma Predisposition.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020
    Review
  13. Precision medicine in Ewing sarcoma: a translational point of view.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

C M HattingerCCRI, St. Anna Children's Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. genetica.onc@ior.it
U Pötschger
M Tarkkanen
J Squire
M Zielenska
S Kiuru-Kuhlefelt
L Kager
P Thorner
S Knuutila
F K Niggli
P F Ambros
H Gadner
D R Betts
St Anna Children's Hospital · ATHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich · CHUniversity of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although greater than 50% of Ewing tumours contain non-random cytogenetic aberrations in addition to the pathognomonic 22q12 rearrangements, little is known about their prognostic significance. To address this question, tumour samples from 134 Ewing tumour patients were analysed using a combination of classical cytogenetics, comparative genomic and fluorescence in situ hybridisation. The evaluation of the compiled data revealed that gain of chromosome 8 occurred in 52% of Ewing tumours but was not a predictive factor for outcome. Gain of 1q was associated with adverse overall survival and event-free survival in all patients, irrespective of whether the tumour was localised or disseminated (overall survival: P=0.002 and P=0.029; event-free survival: P=0.018 and P=0.010). Loss of 16q was a significant predictive factor for adverse overall survival in all patients (P=0.008) and was associated with disseminated disease at diagnosis (P=0.039). Gain of chromosome 12 was associated with adverse event-free survival (P=0.009) in patients with localised disease. These results indicate that in addition to a 22q12 rearrangement confirmation in Ewing tumours it is important to assess the copy number of 1q and 16q to identify patients with a higher probability of adverse outcome.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosome MappingAdultAgedAge FactorsBone NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSarcoma, EwingSex CharacteristicsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID12087464
PMCPMC2375399
OpenAlexW2030988924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.