ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2001
Impact of selected geographical and clinical conditions on thrombolysis rate in myocardial infarction in three departments of France.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective was to assess the impact of selected geographic factors and patients' characteristics on thrombolysis rates in patients resident and hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction in three departments of the Rhĵne-Alpes Region (France). We used a two-level hierarchical model to estimate and explain geographic areas' specific effects. Old subjects and women were less frequently treated than young subjects and men. Severe, non-anterior and non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions were associated with lower thrombolysis rates. It was also lower in patients with a pulmonary chronic disease, a cancer, a peripheral arterial disease, a history of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischaemia attack, and in patients with a psychiatric disorder. After adjusting for patients' characteristics, significant variations in thrombolysis rates remained between geographic areas (up to 3.2 times). These variations seem to be partly explained by distance or isolation: a longer distance to the closest hospital or a high degree of isolation seem to lower the probability of thrombolytic therapy. Several other sources of treatment variation between the studied geographic areas remain unexplored. These factors, especially those that augment the delay to treatment, are to be identified in order to augment fibrinolysis usage and reduce inter-area heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12086084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.