Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12084279›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2001

Management of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

S P Greenfield

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medical versus surgical management for vesicoureteric reflux: the case for medical management.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

S P GreenfieldDepartment of Pediatric Urology, Children"s Hospital of Buffalo, 219 Bryant Street, Buffalo, NY 14222, USA. spg@acsu.buffalo.edu
Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although much has been learned about the diagnosis and management of vesicoureteral reflux, several important areas of investigation remain. Because not all children with reflux are equally susceptible to renal scarring and the development of reflux nephropathy, controversy surrounds the need to evaluate all children with urinary tract infection or to continue prophylaxis in known refluxing children after a certain age. In addition to age, other factors such as sex, grade of reflux, and the presence of voiding dysfunction can all play a role. The grade of reflux as seen on the contrast voiding cystourethrogram is the best predictor of reflux resolution in large numbers of patients, but grade alone cannot predict spontaneous cessation in any one individual. Attempts at refining more quantitative imaging modalities have so far proved unsuccessful. Open ureteral reimplantation remains the standard for surgical care if surgery is necessary. Both cystoscopic and laparoscopic techniques, however, may ultimately prove to be reliable, minimally invasive approaches to definitive correction. Finally, there are data to support continued diagnosis and treatment of reflux in at-risk populations. The incidence of reflux-related morbidity in children has significantly diminished over the last three decades. A major challenge is to better identify at-risk subpopulations of children with reflux, so that not every child will require intensive, long-term medical treatment or surgery.

Indexed as

Age FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantKidney Failure, ChronicMaleSex FactorsVesico-Ureteral Reflux

Identifiers

PMID12084279
OpenAlexW1964592059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.