Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12082183›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002

Restricted islet-cell reactive T cell repertoire of early pancreatic islet infiltrates in NOD mice.

Felix J Baker, Mark Lee, Yueh-hsiu Chien, Mark M Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. De novo identification of CD4Nature methods · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Activation pathways that drive CD4Immunological reviews · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix J BakerHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mark Lee
Yueh-hsiu Chien
Mark M Davis
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms responsible for initiating autoimmune diabetes remain obscure. Here, we describe a method for identifying both the alpha- and beta-chains of the T cell receptor (TCR) from individual pancreatic islet-infiltrating T cells at the earliest stages of disease in nonobese diabetic mice (NOD). Analysis of the TCR repertoire of these early islet infiltrates reveals enrichment for a small subset of TCR sequences. Reconstitution of these TCR in vitro demonstrates that these receptors confer reactivity to islet cells but not to the well characterized autoantigens, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) and insulin. Thus, autoimmune diabetes in NOD may be initiated by a limited number of antigens distinct from GAD65 and insulin.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAutoantigensComplementarity Determining RegionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Genes, T-Cell Receptor alphaGenes, T-Cell Receptor betaGlutamate DecarboxylaseInsulinIn Vitro TechniquesIslets of LangerhansIsoenzymesMiceMice, Inbred NODMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionAutoantigensComplementarity Determining RegionsGlutamate Decarboxylaseglutamate decarboxylase 2InsulinIsoenzymesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta

Identifiers

PMID12082183
PMCPMC123148
OpenAlexW2130207165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.