Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12079670›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2002

Plant D-type cyclins and the control of G1 progression.

E Ann Oakenfull, Catherine Riou-Khamlichi, James A H Murray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cell cycle in plant development and reprogramming.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Overexpression ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ectopic Expression of PoplarFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Overexpression ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. ThePlant physiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E Ann OakenfullInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QT, UK.
Catherine Riou-Khamlichi
James A H Murray
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basic pattern of controls that operate during the G1 phase of the plant cell cycle shows much closer similarity to animals than to the yeasts and other fungi. The activity of D-type cyclin (CycD) kinases is induced in response to stimulatory signals, and these phosphorylate the plant homologue of the retinoblastoma tumour susceptibility (Rb) protein. It is likely that Rb phosphorylation results in the activation of genes under the control of E2F transcription factors, including those required for S phase entry. As the initial triggers of the cascade, attention has focused on the CycDs, and a family of 10 genes is present in Arabidopsis, divided into three major and three minor groups. Analysis to date suggests that these groups are functionally distinct.

Indexed as

Plant CellsCell CycleCell DivisionCyclinsG1 PhaseGene Expression Regulation, PlantYeastsCyclins

Identifiers

PMID12079670
PMCPMC1692988
OpenAlexW1969897518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.