Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12077054›Full record

ReviewGut2002

Neuroanatomy of visceral nociception: vagal and splanchnic afferent.

D Grundy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04716738 (Sexual Dysfunction, Quality of Life and Visceral Hyperalgesia in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04716738 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Sexual Dysfunction, Quality of Life and Visceral Hyperalgesia in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital General de MexicoRan2023 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome, Sexual DysfunctionArmsBlood analyses and coprological
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Changes in Time of Gastric Emptying After Surgical and Endoscopic Bariatrics and Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Proteases and Abdominal Pain-Old Dog, New (Microbial) Tricks.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Responsiveness of afferent renal nerve units in renovascular hypertension in rats.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D GrundyDepartment of Biomedical Science, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, UK. d.grundy@sheffield.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afferent fibres convey sensory information from the upper gastrointestinal tract to the central nervous system but the nature of this information is different for vagal and spinal pathways. Vagal afferents convey predominantly physiological information while spinal afferents are able to encode noxious events. Because of the different response profiles following activation of these pathways, it is likely that vagal and splanchnic afferents play different roles in mediating sensation.

Indexed as

Enteric Nervous SystemFoodGanglia, SpinalGastrointestinal HormonesHumansIntestinal AbsorptionIntestinal MucosaNociceptorsSensationSplanchnic NervesVagus NerveVisceral AfferentsGastrointestinal Hormones

Identifiers

PMID12077054
PMCPMC1867719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.