SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Pooled it
- Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Consumption of Anti-Epileptic Drugs in Primary Health Care in Albania, 2004-2016.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Antiepileptic Drug Treatment in Children with Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Article
- Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository.PloS one · 2014Article
- Treatment options for refractory and difficult to treat seizures: focus on vigabatrin.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2011Article
- Region-specific changes in gene expression in rat brain after chronic treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin.Epilepsia · 2010Article
- Packages of care for epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries.PLoS medicine · 2009Article
- CNS adverse events associated with antiepileptic drugs.CNS drugs · 2008Review
- Article
- Article
- Poststroke epilepsy: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management.Drugs & aging · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, carbamazepine and phenytoin are commonly used antiepileptic drugs. This review summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials in which these two drugs have been compared.
objectivesTo review the best evidence comparing carbamazepine and phenytoin when used as monotherapy in subjects with partial onset seizures, or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures with or without other generalized seizure types. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched: (a) the trial register of the Cochrane Epilepsy Group; (b) The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2001); (c) MEDLINE 1966-2001. In addition we hand searched relevant journals and contacted the pharmaceutical industry and researchers in the field to seek any ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials in children or adults with partial onset seizures or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. Trials must have included a comparison of carbamazepine monotherapy with phenytoin monotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This was an individual patient data review. Outcomes were time to (a) withdrawal of allocated treatment, (b) 12 month remission, (c) six month remission, and (d) first seizure post randomization. Data were analysed using a stratified logrank analysis with results expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), where a HR>1 indicates an event is more likely on phenytoin. MAIN
resultsIndividual patient data are available for 551 participants from three trials, representing 63% of the participants recruited into the nine trials that met our inclusion criteria. By convention, for the outcomes time to six and 12 month remission HR>1 indicates a clinical advantage for phenytoin, whilst for time to withdrawal and first seizure HR>1 indicates a clinical advantage for carbamazepine. Results (HR (95% CI)) were: (i) time to withdrawal of allocated treatment 0.97(0.74 to 1.28), (ii) time to 12 month remission 1.00(0.78 to 1.29), (iii) time to six month remission 1.10(0.87 to 1.39), (iv) time to first seizure 0.91(0.74 to 1.12). The results suggest no overall difference between carbamazepine and phenytoin for these outcomes. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsWe have not found evidence that a significant difference exists between carbamazepine and phenytoin for the outcomes examined in this review. Confidence intervals are wide and the possibility of important differences existing has not been excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.