Treatment of infantile spasms.

backgroundInfantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome which includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure, usually hypsarrhythmia and in the majority of patients, psychomotor retardation. It remains poorly understood and despite modern imaging techniques an underlying cause is often not found. Little is known about their pathophysiological basis and treatment remains problematic.

objectivesTo compare the effects of single drugs used to treat infantile spasms upon long-term psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, control of the spasms and side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Our search included the Cochrane Epilepsy Group trials register, MEDLINE (1960 to 2001), EMBASE (1981 to 2001), contacting pharmaceutical companies and appeals at international conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the administration of drugs to people with infantile spasms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Study quality and potential sources of heterogeneity were assessed. Outcomes included cessation of spasms, time to cessation of spasms, participants with cessation of spasms remaining spasm free, reduction in spasms, resolution of hypsarrhythmia, subsequent epilepsy rates and side effects. MAIN

resultsTen small RCTs were included. In total these studies recruited just 335 participants and tested eight different drugs. Overall, studies were of poor methodological quality. No study assessed long-term psychomotor development or the development of other seizure types. One small study found vigabatrin to be more efficacious than hydrocortisone in stopping infantile spasms in a group of people with tuberous sclerosis. One underpowered study showed a trend for vigabatrin to be more efficacious than placebo in stopping infantile spasms, two small studies when combined showed ACTH to be more efficacious than low-dose prednisone (2mg/kg). It was not possible to compare reduction in the number of spasms between the different treatments because of differences in methods of analysis. Overall, only nine participants were reported to have been withdrawn from the trial treatments due to side effects and two deaths were reported. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsWe found no reliable evidence that any of the treatments assessed were more efficacious than any other. Few studies considered psychomotor development or subsequent seizure rates as outcomes and none had long term follow-up. Further trials with larger numbers of participants, and longer follow-up are required.