SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Routine versus selective antifungal administration for control of fungal infections in patients with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Voriconazole versus amphotericin B or fluconazole in cancer patients with neutropenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines on acute kidney injury: part 1: definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2012Guideline
- Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Antifungal therapy in infants and children with proven, probable or suspected invasive fungal infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Antifungal agents for preventing fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
- Article
- Water-Soluble Nystatin and Derivative.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2022Article
- Opportunist Coinfections by Nontuberculous Mycobacteria and Fungi in Immunocompromised Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1).Critical care (London, England) · 2013Review
- Section 4: Contrast-induced AKI.Kidney international supplements · 2012Article
- Section 3: Prevention and Treatment of AKI.Kidney international supplements · 2012Article
- Invasive aspergillosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management in immunocompromised patients.Drugs · 2007Review
- Fungal infection-related mortality versus total mortality as an outcome in trials of antifungal agents.BMC medical research methodology · 2006Review
- Invasive fungal infection in very low birthweight infants: national prospective surveillance study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic fungal infection is considered to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, particularly those with neutropenia. Antifungal drugs are often given prophylactically, or to patients with persistent fever.
objectivesTo compare the effect of fluconazole and amphotericin B on morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE and Cochrane Library (November 2001). Letters, abstracts, and unpublished trials. The industry and authors were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on mortality, invasive fungal infection, colonisation, use of additional (escape) antifungal therapy and adverse effects leading to discontinuation of therapy were extracted by both authors independently. MAIN
resultsSixteen trials (3760 patients, 341 deaths) were included. In 3 large 3-armed trials, results for amphotericin B were combined with results for nystatin in a "polyene" group. Because nystatin is an ineffective drug in these circumstances, this approach creates a bias in favour of fluconazole. Furthermore, most patients were randomised to oral amphotericin B, which is poorly absorbed and poorly documented. It was unclear whether there was overlap among the "polyene" trials. We were unable to obtain any information to clarify these issues from the trial authors or from Pfizer, the manufacturer of fluconazole. There were no significant differences in effect between fluconazole and amphotericin B, but the confidence intervals were wide. More patients dropped out of the study when they received amphotericin B, but as none of the trials were blinded, decisions on premature interruption of therapy could have been biased. Furthermore, amphotericin B was rarely given under optimal circumstances, with premedication to reduce infusion-related toxicity, slow infusion, and with potassium and magnesium supplements to prevent nephrotoxicity. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsAmphotericin B had been disfavoured in several of the trials through their design or analysis. Since intravenous amphotericin B is the only antifungal agent for which there is good evidence suggesting an effect on mortality and is considerably cheaper than fluconazole, it should be preferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12076388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.