Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12076383›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy.

M S Kramer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05394883 (The SPROUT), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05394883 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The SPROUT (Pilot) Project: Starting Pregnancy With Robustness for Optimal Upward Trajectories

TypeinterventionalSponsorState University of New York - Upstate Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled18ConditionsPregnancy Related, Infant Development, Adherence, Treatment, Activity, MotorArmsSupervised Exercise, Home Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  4. Exercise for diabetic pregnant women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The Influence of Prenatal Exercise on Offspring Health: A Review.Clinical medicine insights. Women's health · 2016
    Review
  8. Prevention of preeclampsia.Journal of pregnancy · 2012
    Review
  9. Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy.Journal of general internal medicine · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M S KramerMcGill University, Faculty of Medicine, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A2. mikek@epid.lan.mcgill.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysiological responses of the fetus (especially increase in heart rate) to single, brief bouts of maternal exercise have been documented frequently, suggesting that maternal exercise might have beneficial or adverse effects on pregnancy outcome.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of advising healthy pregnant women to engage in regular (at least two to three times per week) aerobic exercise on physical fitness, labour and delivery, and the outcome of pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched and researchers in the field were contacted. Date of last search: January 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Acceptably controlled comparisons of prescribed aerobic exercise programmes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN

resultsTen trials involving 688 women were included. The trials were not of high methodologic quality. Five trials reported significant improvement in physical fitness in the exercise group, although differences in measures used to assess fitness prevent a quantitative pooling of results. Six trials reported on pregnancy outcomes. A statistically significant increased risk of preterm birth (relative risk (RR) = 2.29 [95% confidence interval 1.02 to 5.13]) in the exercise group is inconsistent with the absence of effect on mean gestational age [+0.0 (-0.4 to +0.4) weeks] and may have been biased by post-randomization exclusion of women with preterm labor. Results bearing on fetal growth (birth weight, length, and head circumference) were highly variable. One trial found improvements among exercising women in several aspects of self-reported body image, including muscle strength, energy level, and body build. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsRegular aerobic exercise during pregnancy appears to improve (or maintain) physical fitness and body image. Available data are insufficient to infer important risks or benefits for the mother or infant.

Indexed as

ExercisePregnancyFemaleHumansPregnancy Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.