Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12076381›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Antibiotics for gonorrhoea in pregnancy.

P Brocklehurst

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Treating common problems of the nose and throat in pregnancy: what is safe?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2008
    Review
  7. Treating common ear problems in pregnancy: what is safe?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2008
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P BrocklehurstNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF. peter.brocklehurst@perinat.ox.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeisseria gonorrhoeae can be transmitted from the mother's genital tract to the newborn during birth and can cause gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum as well as systemic neonatal infection. It can also cause endometritis and pelvic sepsis in the mother.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotic regimens in the treatment of genital infection with gonorrhoea during pregnancy with respect to neonatal and maternal morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (November 2001) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2001) were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of one regimen of antibiotic versus another in pregnant women with culture confirmed genital gonococcal infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by one reviewer. MAIN

resultsTwo trials involving 346 women were included. The only outcome included in these trials was the incidence of 'cure' assessed by bacterial culture. Failure to achieve 'microbiological cure' was similar for each antibiotic regimen: Amoxicillin plus probenecid compared with spectinomycin (odds ratio (OR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-8.12), amoxicillin plus probenecid compared with ceftriaxone (OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.71-8.12) and ceftriaxone compared with cefixime (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.16-9.04). Side effects were uncommon for all the tested regimens. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe number of women included in each of the comparisons is small and therefore, although no differences were detected between the different antibiotic regimens, the trials were limited in their ability to detect important but modest differences. For women who are allergic to penicillin, this review provides some reassurance that treatment with ceftriaxone or spectinomycin appears to have similar effectiveness in producing microbiological cure.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleGonorrheaHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.