SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Antibiotics for gonorrhoea in pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Antenatal lower genital tract infection screening and treatment programs for preventing preterm delivery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases enable diversification of all nucleotides in a tunable window.Nature · 2018Article
- Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help?BMC public health · 2010Article
- Treating common problems of the nose and throat in pregnancy: what is safe?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2008Review
- Treating common ear problems in pregnancy: what is safe?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2008Review
- A steric block in translation caused by the antibiotic spectinomycin.ACS chemical biology · 2007Article
- A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in maternal medicine.BMC medicine · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeisseria gonorrhoeae can be transmitted from the mother's genital tract to the newborn during birth and can cause gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum as well as systemic neonatal infection. It can also cause endometritis and pelvic sepsis in the mother.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotic regimens in the treatment of genital infection with gonorrhoea during pregnancy with respect to neonatal and maternal morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (November 2001) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2001) were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of one regimen of antibiotic versus another in pregnant women with culture confirmed genital gonococcal infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by one reviewer. MAIN
resultsTwo trials involving 346 women were included. The only outcome included in these trials was the incidence of 'cure' assessed by bacterial culture. Failure to achieve 'microbiological cure' was similar for each antibiotic regimen: Amoxicillin plus probenecid compared with spectinomycin (odds ratio (OR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-8.12), amoxicillin plus probenecid compared with ceftriaxone (OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.71-8.12) and ceftriaxone compared with cefixime (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.16-9.04). Side effects were uncommon for all the tested regimens. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe number of women included in each of the comparisons is small and therefore, although no differences were detected between the different antibiotic regimens, the trials were limited in their ability to detect important but modest differences. For women who are allergic to penicillin, this review provides some reassurance that treatment with ceftriaxone or spectinomycin appears to have similar effectiveness in producing microbiological cure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12076381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.