ReviewDrugs2002
Ramipril: a review of its use in the prevention of cardiovascular outcomes.
Review in Drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-line antihypertensive treatment in patients with pre-diabetes: rationale, design and baseline results of the ADaPT investigation.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2008Trial
- GPCRs as key regulators in wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Synthesis of Selenium-DecoratedThe Journal of organic chemistry · 2024Article
- Valvejet Technology for the Production of a Personalised Fixed Dose Combination of Ramipril and Glimepiride: an Investigative Study on the Stability of Ramipril.Pharmaceutical research · 2018Article
- Stereo- and Regioselective Synthesis of 4-Vinylpyrrolidine from N-Tethered Alkyne-Alkenol.ACS omega · 2018Article
- Do the Effects of Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in PAD Patients Differ from Other Atherosclerotic Disease?International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Review
- Diastereoselective pyrrolidine synthesis via copper promoted intramolecular aminooxygenation of alkenes: formal synthesis of (+)-monomorine.Organic letters · 2009Article
- Quality and stability of ramipril generics/copies versus reference ramipril (Tritace): a 3-month stability comparative study.Clinical drug investigation · 2009Article
- Effects of oral fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus ramipril and losartan plus ramipril in hypertension: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase iii trial in adult indian patients.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2005Article
- Tolerability of ramipril 10 mg daily in high-risk cardiovascular patients in Taiwan: experience from Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2005Article
- Kinetic spectrophotometric method for the determination of ramipril in pharmaceutical formulations.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2005Article
- Review
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors side effects--physiologic and non-physiologic considerations.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledRamipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, is a prodrug which is rapidly hydrolysed after absorption to the active metabolite ramiprilat. Earlier trials have shown that ACE inhibitors, when given to patients with low ejection fractions, have reduced the relative risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and other ischaemic events by 14 to 23%. Subsequently, the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study has shown that, in patients who are not known to have low ejection fraction or heart failure but are at increased risk for developing cardiovascular events, ramipril reduced the incidence of stroke, MI and death due to cardiovascular disease. Results from the HOPE study, in which 9297 patients were randomised to receive either ramipril 10 mg/day or placebo for a mean of 4.5 years, indicate that ramipril reduced the relative risk of the composite outcome of MI, stroke and cardiovascular death by 22%. The incidence of the composite outcome was significantly lower in the ramipril group than in the placebo group (14.0 vs 17.8%). Patients who received ramipril, compared with placebo recipients, had a significantly decreased incidence of stroke, MI or death due to cardiovascular disease (3.4 vs 4.9%, 9.9 vs 12.3% and 6.1 vs 8.1%, respectively). The relative risk of death from any cause was reduced among patients who received ramipril. In addition, treatment with ramipril reduced as the incidence of revascularisation procedures, and, among patients with diabetes mellitus, ramipril reduced the incidence of complications related to diabetes mellitus, including the development of overt nephropathy. Moreover, in patients without a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, ramipril, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the development of diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, compared with patients receiving placebo, patients receiving ramipril had a reduced rate of progression of carotid artery wall thickness.
conclusionRamipril 10 mg/day can significantly reduce the incidence of MI, stroke or death from cardiovascular causes in patients aged > or =55 years who are at increased risk for the development of ischaemic cardiovascular events due to a history of stroke, coronary artery disease (with controlled blood pressure), diabetes mellitus plus at least one other risk factor or peripheral vascular disease but no heart failure or low ejection fraction. Therefore, in addition to dietary and lifestyle modifications, ramipril should be an integral part of secondary prevention therapy in patients at increased risk for the development of cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.