ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2002
Burkitt's and Burkitt-like lymphoma.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multicenter phase II study incorporating high-dose rituximab and liposomal doxorubicin into the CODOX-M/IVAC regimen for untreated Burkitt's lymphoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013Trial
- Effect of Meloxicam on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of the Raji Cell Line: an In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma overexpression and knockdown: impact on human B cell lymphoma proliferation and survival.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2009Article
- Farnesyl transferase inhibitors induce extended remissions in transgenic mice with mature B cell lymphomas.Molecular cancer · 2008Article
- Epstein-Barr virus provides a survival factor to Burkitt's lymphomas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burkitt's and Burkitt-like lymphoma (BL/BLL) are aggressive B-cell malignancies with a high proliferative rate that may be fatal within months if not treated promptly. Furthermore, treatment of BL/BLL requires comprehensive supportive care to avoid disease-related complications such as acute renal failure secondary to tumor lysis syndrome. Improvements in our understanding of the biology of BL and BLL have led to more effective therapeutic protocols. Clinical trials have demonstrated that short duration, multi-agent, dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens combined with aggressive central nervous system therapy results in long-term survival rates in children and young adults near 70% to 80%, whereas long-term disease-free survival rates in older adults remains suboptimal at 15% to 25%. Outcomes in HIV-associated BL/BLL are improved because of more effective chemotherapy regimens and enhanced HIV care. Autologous bone marrow transplantation has proven feasible in many patient populations with BL/BLL and may lead to cure in selected patients. Improved therapeutic strategies are warranted, such as integrating agents such as monoclonal antibodies to combination dose-intensive chemotherapy. Moreover, further study into the molecular biology of BL/BLL with attention to the role of c-myc dysregulation is needed to help predict prognostic factors and for the development of molecular targeted therapies. Clinical trials remain critical to determine the most effective treatment regimens that will continue to improve cure rates in this aggressive but treatable disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.