Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12072661›Full record

ReviewCritical care medicine2002

Pharmacology of acid suppression in the hospital setting: focus on proton pump inhibition.

Joseph R Pisegna

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care medicine, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03098537 (Effects of Enteral Nutrition on Stress Ulcer Hemorrage. Multicenter Randomized Controlled), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03098537 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Enteral Nutrition on Stress Ulcer Hemorrage. Multicenter Randomized Controlled

TypeinterventionalSponsorTC Erciyes UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled500ConditionsEnteral Nutrition, Gastro Intestinal Bleeding, Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis, Proton Pump InhibitorArmsenteral nutrition + proton pump inhibitor, enteral nutrition only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Proton pump inhibitor use is associated with increased complications compared to H2-receptor antagonists following multi-level lumbar fusion: a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph R PisegnaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA. jpisegna@ucla.edu
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK041301 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROZENGURT, JUAN ENRIQUE · 1990 to 2019
$18.0M
BLRD VA I01 BX004560NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK041301RRD VA I01 RX000194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The more potent and longer-lasting inhibition of gastric acid secretion provided by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as compared with histamine-2-receptor antagonists is caused in large part by differences in their mechanism of action. PPIs block histamine-2-, gastrin-, and cholinergic-mediated sources of acid production and inhibit gastric secretion at the final common pathway of the H+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase proton pump. In contrast, histamine-2-receptor antagonists cannot block receptor sites other than those mediated by histamine. It seems that the rapid loss of acid suppression activity by the histamine-2-receptor antagonists may be attributed to tolerance. Such tolerance has not occurred in patients receiving PPIs because these agents are irreversible inhibitors of the H+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase proton pump. For these reasons, patients who have acid-related disorders that require high levels of acid suppression do not respond well to intravenous histamine-2-receptor antagonists and would be excellent candidates for intravenous PPI therapy. Candidates for intravenous PPIs also include patients who cannot receive oral PPIs and those who may need the higher acid suppression therapy provided by the intravenous rather than the oral route. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous pantoprazole in maintaining adequate control of gastric acid output during the switch from oral to intravenous therapy in patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease or the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Intragastric administration of solutions prepared from oral PPIs has been used as an alternative to the intravenous route in critical care settings. However, decreased bioavailability may limit the value of intragastric delivery of PPIs because of the high frequency of gastric emptying problems in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Hospitalization2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesAntacidsBenzimidazolesClinical Trials as TopicGastric AcidHumansIntensive Care UnitsOmeprazolePantoprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsSulfoxidesTreatment Outcome2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesAntacidsBenzimidazolesOmeprazolePantoprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID12072661
PMCPMC6736586
OpenAlexW2105896108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.