ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine
Stem cell generation and choice of fate: role of cytokines and cellular microenvironment.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of membrane potential in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2009Review
- The epigenetic influence of tumor and embryonic microenvironments: how different are they?Cancer microenvironment : official journal of the International Cancer Microenvironment Society · 2008Article
- Neoductular progenitor cells regenerate hepatocytes in severely damaged liver: a comparative ultrastructural study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineArticle
- Stemness, fusion and renewal of hematopoietic and embryonic stem cells.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineReview
- Tissue engineering of cultured skin substitutes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) have provided a model for the isolation, enrichment and transplantation of stem cells. Gene targeting studies in mice have shown that expression of the thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) is linked to the accumulation of HSCs capable to generate long-term blood repopulation when injected into irradiated mice. The powerful increase in vivo in HSC numbers by retrovirally transduced HOX4B, a homeotic gene, along with the role of the TpoR, suggested that stem cell fate, renewal, differentiation and number can be controlled. The discovery of the precise region of the mouse embryo where HSCs originate and the isolation of supporting stromal cell lines open the possibility of identifying the precise signals required for HSC choice of fate. The completion of human genome sequencing coupled with advances in gene expression profiling using DNA microarrays will enable the identification of key genes deciding the fate of stem cells. Downstream from HSCs, multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cells appear to co-express a multiplicity of genes characteristic of different blood lineages. Genomic approaches will permit the identification of the select group of genes consolidated by the commitment of these multipotent progenitors towards one or the other of the blood lineages. Studies with neural stem cells pointed to the unexpected plastic nature of these cells. Isolation of stem cells from multiple tissues may suggest that, providing the appropriate environment/ signal, tissues could be regenerated in the laboratory and used for transplantation. A spectacular example of influence of the environment on cell fate was revealed decades ago by using mouse embryonic stem cells (ES). Injected into blastocysts, ES cells contribute to the formation of all adult tissues. Injected into adult mice, ES cells become cancer cells. After multiple passages as ascites, when injected back into the blastocyst environment, ES- derived cancer cells behaved again as ES cells. More recently, the successful cloning of mammals and reprogramming of transferred nuclei by factors in the cytoplasm of oocytes turned back the clock by showing that differentiated nuclei can be "re-booted" to generate again the stem cells for different tissues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.