ArticleAtencion primaria2002
[Assessment of drug treatment for hypertension in a health centre as a function of associated chronic pathologies and degree of control of the hypertension].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the suitability of whatever hypertension medication is prescribed for the associated pathology in each patient, and to analyse the monitoring of blood pressure figures.
designA cross-sectional descriptive study.Setting. Urban health centre. PATIENTS: The target population were the hypertension patients being treated with medication and monitored at the health centre. Stratified random sampling by quotas of the total number with hypertension was performed. The sample numbered 219 patients. MEASUREMENTS: The clinical history of each patient selected was reviewed. To evaluate the hypertension treatment, we established three levels of suitability with regard to the accompanying pathology of each patient (suitable, intermediate, unsuitable), using the 1999 Hypertension Protocol of the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine.
resultsOut of 219 cases, treatment was suitable in 71 (32.4%), intermediate in 91 (41.6%), and unsuitable in 57 (26%). The most frequently indicated drug group was the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) group and, jointly, ACEI and diuretics. Regarding the monitoring of blood pressure: 66.5% had very good monitoring, 23.2% partial and 9% poor.
conclusionsMost treatments are at an intermediate level of suitability: without beneficial or undesirable effects on the associated pathology. This makes us think we need to optimize the drug indicators for hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.