ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002
Tuning the membrane surface potential for efficient toxin import.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding MPEx Hydropathy Analysis to Account for Electrostatic Contributions to Protein Interactions with Anionic Membranes.The Journal of membrane biology · 2021Article
- Investigating Ions at Amphiphilic Monolayers with X-ray Fluorescence.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2019Article
- Article
- Test of the Gouy-Chapman theory for a charged lipid membrane against explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations.Physical review letters · 2008Article
- Chemical and photochemical modification of colicin E1 and gramicidin A in bilayer lipid membranes.The Journal of membrane biology · 2004Article
- Electrochemical and photon polarization modulation infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy study of the electric field driven transformations of a phospholipid bilayer supported at a gold electrode surface.Biophysical journal · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane surface electrostatic interactions impose structural constraints on imported proteins. An unprecedented sensitive dependence on these constraints was seen in the voltage-gated import and channel formation by the C-terminal pore-forming domain of the bacteriocin, colicin E1. At physiological ionic strengths, significant channel current was observed only in a narrow interval of anionic lipid content ([L-]), with the maximum current (I(max)) at 25-30 mol% (dioleoyl)-phosphatidylglycerol ([L-]max) corresponding to a surface potential of the lipid bilayer in the absence of protein, psi(o)max = -60 +/- 5 mV. Higher ionic strength shifted [L-]max to larger values, but psi(o)max remained approximately constant. It is proposed that the channel current (i) increases and (ii) decreases at /psi(o)/ values <55 mV and >65 mV, because of (i) electrostatic interactions needed for effective insertion of the channel polypeptide and (ii) constraints due to electrostatic forces on the flexibility needed for cooperative insertion into the membrane. The loss of flexibility for /psi(o)/ 65 mV was demonstrated by the absence of thermally induced intraprotein distance changes of the bound polypeptide. The anionic lipid content, 25-30 mol%, corresponding to the channel current maxima, is similar to that of the target Escherichia coli cytoplasmic membrane and membranes of mesophilic microorganisms. This suggests that one reason the membrane surface potential is tuned in vivo is to facilitate protein import.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.