Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12059111›Full record

ArticleMolecular biotechnology2002

Typing dinucleotide repeats under nondenaturing conditions with single-base resolution and high sizing precision.

Santiago Rodríguez, Carlos Zapata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Santiago RodríguezDepartamento de Biología Fundamental, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carlos Zapata

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dinucleotide repeats are genetic markers that are useful for many purposes, including genetic epidemiology, population genetics, and genetic diagnostics. The accuracy of analyses based on dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms is highly dependent on the success achieved in minimizing genotyping errors. Genotyping errors in dinucleotide repeat typing may arise for various reasons, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) processing errors and the use of unsuitable electrophoretic conditions for resolving amplification products (i.e., lack of single-base resolution and inadequate precision in allele sizing). We have recently described a nondenaturing electrophoretic system useful for detecting PCR processing errors that lead to misidentification of heterozygotes as homozygotes in (AC)n repeat typing. Here, we show that this system also allows resolution of (AC)n repeats in native conditions with single-base resolution and high sizing precision, on the basis of an analysis of seven human (AC)n repeats ranging in size from 72 to 217 bp. This PAGE system is thus also useful for reducing the likelihood both of allele misidentification due to the absence of single-base resolution and of inaccuracies in allele sizing due to anomalous electrophoretic migrations among the alleles within an (AC)n repeat.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesGenotypeAllelesElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFemaleHumansMalePedigreePolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID12059111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.