ArticleMolecular biotechnology2002
Typing dinucleotide repeats under nondenaturing conditions with single-base resolution and high sizing precision.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probing biomolecular structures and dynamics of single molecules using in-gel alternating-laser excitation.Analytical chemistry · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dinucleotide repeats are genetic markers that are useful for many purposes, including genetic epidemiology, population genetics, and genetic diagnostics. The accuracy of analyses based on dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms is highly dependent on the success achieved in minimizing genotyping errors. Genotyping errors in dinucleotide repeat typing may arise for various reasons, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) processing errors and the use of unsuitable electrophoretic conditions for resolving amplification products (i.e., lack of single-base resolution and inadequate precision in allele sizing). We have recently described a nondenaturing electrophoretic system useful for detecting PCR processing errors that lead to misidentification of heterozygotes as homozygotes in (AC)n repeat typing. Here, we show that this system also allows resolution of (AC)n repeats in native conditions with single-base resolution and high sizing precision, on the basis of an analysis of seven human (AC)n repeats ranging in size from 72 to 217 bp. This PAGE system is thus also useful for reducing the likelihood both of allele misidentification due to the absence of single-base resolution and of inaccuracies in allele sizing due to anomalous electrophoretic migrations among the alleles within an (AC)n repeat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12059111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.