ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2000
Accelerated and blastic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Silico Molecular Modeling of Four New Afatinib Derived Molecules Targeting the Inhibition of the Mutated Form of BCR-ABL T315I.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia initially presenting as severe acute intracerebral hemorrhage.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis with Oncogenic Potential (CHOP): Separation from CHIP and Roads to AML.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Differential clinical and prognostic impact of myeloid sarcoma vs medullary myeloid blast phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.Blood cancer journal · 2016Article
- Imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): Current concepts on pathogenesis and new emerging pharmacologic approaches.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2007Article
- Blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is currently no standard treatment for the blastic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-BC), which is a chemoresistant form of acute leukemia. Current approaches include using standard acute myeloid leukemia (AML) regimens in an effort to induce remission, variations of these approaches with drugs that seem more active in this specific leukemia, and the direct entry of patients into studies of investigational agents. Although the likelihood of achieving remission is small, immediate bone marrow transplantation in remission should be considered because it provides the only opportunity for long-term survival at this time. Allogeneic transplantation is preferred, but autologous transplantation of an early chronic phase marrow may provide benefit. Often, however, the duration of chemotherapy-induced remission of blast crisis is very short and may preclude entry into a transplant program. In addition, the patient may not be a candidate due to donor issues, age, or medical problems. If transplant is not an option, maintenance interferon is often used, although its benefit is uncertain. For patients in the accelerated phase of the disease, which is characterized by a variety of clinical presentations and cytogenetic abnormalities, the possibility of favorably manipulating the disease is greater. Again, there is no standard treatment, and clinical trials are recommended as first-line therapy. Treatment in the accelerated phase includes standard AML chemotherapy regimens, combinations of new agents, and the combination of cytostatic agents with interferon. Patients whose accelerated phase reverts to chronic phase after treatment may become candidates for bone marrow transplantation. However, current new approaches to the chronic phase applied in accelerated phase as well as new approaches directed specifically toward accelerated phase may lead to prolonged stabilization without bone marrow transplantation. In view of a median age of 55 at diagnosis of chronic phase, nontransplant regimens for accelerated phase that produce long-term benefit are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.