Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12052870›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2002

Interactions of the Mcm1 MADS box protein with cofactors that regulate mating in yeast.

Janet Mead, Adrian R Bruning, Michael K Gill, Andrew M Steiner, Thomas B Acton, Andrew K Vershon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ancient transcriptional regulators can easily evolve new pair-wise cooperativity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janet MeadWaksman Institute of Microbiology and Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8020, USA.
Adrian R Bruning
Michael K Gill
Andrew M Steiner
Thomas B Acton
Andrew K Vershon

Funding

MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS OF A YEAST HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINR01GM049265 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI VERSHON, ANDREW · 1993 to 2005
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM49265NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yeast Mcm1 protein is a member of the MADS box family of transcriptional regulatory factors, a class of DNA-binding proteins that control numerous cellular and developmental processes in yeast, Drosophila melanogaster, plants, and mammals. Although these proteins bind DNA on their own, they often combine with different cofactors to bind with increased affinity and specificity to their target sites. To understand how this class of proteins functions, we have made a series of alanine substitutions in the MADS box domain of Mcm1 and examined the effects of these mutations in combination with its cofactors that regulate mating in yeast. Our results indicate which residues of Mcm1 are essential for viability and transcriptional regulation with its cofactors in vivo. Most of the mutations in Mcm1 that are lethal affect DNA-binding affinity. Interestingly, the lethality of many of these mutations can be suppressed if the MCM1 gene is expressed from a high-copy-number plasmid. Although many of the alanine substitutions affect the ability of Mcm1 to activate transcription alone or in combination with the alpha 1 and Ste12 cofactors, most mutations have little or no effect on Mcm1-mediated repression in combination with the alpha 2 cofactor. Even nonconservative amino acid substitutions of residues in Mcm1 that directly contact alpha 2 do not significantly affect repression. These results suggest that within the same region of the Mcm1 MADS box domain, there are different requirements for interaction with alpha 2 than for interaction with either alpha1 or Ste12. Our results suggest how a small domain, the MADS box, interacts with multiple cofactors to achieve specificity in transcriptional regulation and how subtle differences in the sequences of different MADS box proteins can influence the interactions with specific cofactors while not affecting the interactions with common cofactors.

Indexed as

AlanineBase SequenceFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, LethalHomeodomain ProteinsMinichromosome Maintenance 1 ProteinModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesisProtein ConformationRepressor ProteinsReproductionSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticAlanineFungal ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsMATA1 protein, S cerevisiaeMATA2 protein, S cerevisiaeMinichromosome Maintenance 1 ProteinRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTE12 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12052870
PMCPMC133914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.