ArticlePharmacoEconomics2002
Use of healthcare services by patients treated with risperidone versus conventional antipsychotic agents.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Choice of atypical antipsychotic therapy for patients with schizophrenia: An analysis of a medicaid population.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2005Article
- Assessing the value of antipsychotics for treating schizophrenia: the importance of evaluating and interpreting the clinical significance of individual service costs.PharmacoEconomics · 2004Review
- Methods for claims-based pharmacoeconomic studies in psychosis.PharmacoEconomics · 2002Review
- Sociodemographic and economic comparisons of children prescribed longer-acting versus short-acting stimulant medications for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.The journal of behavioral health services & researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether the use of risperidone in a US managed-care environment is associated with a reduction in the use of mental healthcare services.
methodsMental health service use and costs for patients with psychoses treated with risperidone versus those treated with conventional antipsychotic agents were compared by both between-group and within-group comparisons. The study controlled for differences between the groups. Only direct medical costs were considered. All costs were for the years 1994 to 1996. PERSPECTIVE: US managed care plan.
resultsCosts (excluding antipsychotic drug costs) per member per month (PMPM) were 180 US dollars lower with risperidone (p < 0.05); per member per year (PMPY) costs were 2160 US dollars lower. In patients who received both risperidone and conventional treatments, PMPM costs were 212 US dollars (2544 US dollars PMPY) lower during risperidone treatment. Total costs (including antipsychotic drug costs) were 624 US dollars PMPY lower with risperidone by between-group comparisons and 1008 US dollars PMPY lower by within-group comparisons.
conclusionsThese results show that higher risperidone acquisition costs are offset by reductions in other mental healthcare costs, particularly inpatient hospitalisation costs. This indicates that risperidone may be a more economical choice than traditional antipsychotics for the treatment of psychoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12052100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.