ReviewEndocrine reviews2002
Microarray-based expression profiling of normal and malignant immune cells.
Review in Endocrine reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification of Widely and Rarely Expressed Genes with Recurrent Neural Network.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- Gene expression analysis using single molecule detection.Nucleic acids research · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in gene microarray technology have facilitated global analyses of gene expression profiles in normal and malignant immune cells. Great strides have been made in our understanding of molecular differences among various types of immune cells, the process of T and B cell activation, and the genomic changes that convert normal cells to malignant ones. Genomic analysis has become a crucial aspect of cancer classification, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. This technology has the potential to reveal the comprehensive transcriptional alterations that dictate fundamental biological processes such as signal transduction in response to specific stimuli, cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. While reaping the benefits of genomic analyses, it is important to realize its limitations with respect to accuracy of interpretation, reproducibility, and signal detection. It is crucial to optimize signals for individual probe-target pairs and to develop a uniform set of criteria for data analyses. The development of a public-access database of results from individual laboratories will pave the way for identifying discrepancies and advancing scientific breakthroughs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.