Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12046368›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2002

Community education on preterm birth. Does it change practice?

Ann Sprague, Paula Stewart, Patricia Niday, Carl Nimrod, Robin Walker

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ann SpraguePerinatal Partnership Program, University of Ottawa, Ontario. asprague@ottawahospital.on.ca
Paula Stewart
Patricia Niday
Carl Nimrod
Robin Walker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate how well physicians and other prenatal care providers educate women about early recognition of and appropriate response to the signs and symptoms of preterm labour (PTL). To assess use of antenatal steroids for babies born at less than 34 weeks' gestation.

designBefore-after study using a population-based approach.

settingHealth care providers' offices, hospitals, and prenatal classes in Ottawa, Ont.

participantsPrenatal care providers, women in hospital after giving birth, prenatal class participants.

interventionsPrenatal care providers received information and educational materials on PTL and preterm birth (PTB). They passed this information on to pregnant women at their 18- to 20-week prenatal visits. Teachers of prenatal classes gave the same information in early-series classes. Clinical practice guidelines were developed, and hospital staff received education on appropriate response to PTL.

main outcome measuresUse of educational materials and steroid treatment.

resultsStatistically significant increases were seen in the numbers of care providers who had educational material about PTL and PTB, who reported giving the educational material to all women, and who reported discussing signs and symptoms of PTL and PTB with all women; women who reported that their care providers talked with them about PTL and PTB, and women delivering preterm (< 34 weeks) babies who received steroids.

conclusionProviding knowledge and standardized educational materials to health care providers can help improve preventive practice for PTL and educate women about PTL.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansObstetric Labor, PrematureOntarioPatient Education as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyPrenatal CareSteroidsSteroids

Identifiers

PMID12046368
PMCPMC2214030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.