ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2002
Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety.BMC health services research · 2016Review
- Association between hospital-level obstetric quality indicators and maternal and neonatal morbidity.JAMA · 2014Observational
- Family physician and obstetrician episiotomy rates in low-risk obstetrics in southern Alberta.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2011Article
- Effect of hospital setting and volume on clinical outcomes in women with gestational and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2009Article
- Effect of hospital volume on maternal outcomes in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing trial of labor.American journal of epidemiology · 2008Article
- Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: do generalists' patients have different outcomes than specialists' patients?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2007Article
- Does experience or delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcomes?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2004Article
- Delivery volume debated.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002Article
- Delivery volume debated.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002Article
- Delivery volume debated.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002Article
- Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Effect on Safety Culture and Cesarean Delivery.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of births attended by individual family physicians who practice intrapartum care varies. We wanted to determine if the practice-volume relations that have been shown in other fields of medical practice also exist in maternity care practice by family doctors.
methodsFor the period April 1997 to August 1998, we analyzed all singleton births at a major maternity teaching hospital for which the family physician was the responsible physician. Physicians were grouped into 3 categories on the basis of the number of births they attended each year: fewer than 12, 12 to 24, and 25 or more. Physicians with a low volume of deliveries (72 physicians, 549 births), those with a medium volume of deliveries (34 physicians, 871 births) and those with a high volume of deliveries (46 physicians, 3024 births) were compared in terms of maternal and newborn outcomes. The main outcome measures were maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score and admission of the baby to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care unit. Secondary outcomes were obstetric procedures and consultation patterns.
resultsThere was no difference among the 3 volume cohorts in terms of rates of maternal complications of delivery, 5-minute Apgar scores of less than 7 or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit or the special care unit, either before or after adjustment for parity, pregnancy-induced hypertension, diabetes, ethnicity, lone parent status, maternal age, gestational age, newborn birth weight and newborn head circumference at birth. High- and medium-volume family physicians consulted with obstetricians less often than low-volume family physicians (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.586 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.479-0.718] and 0.739 [95% CI 0.583-0.935] respectively). High- and medium-volume family physicians transferred the delivery to an obstetrician less often than low-volume family physicians (adjusted OR 0.668 [95% CI 0.542-0.823] and 0.776 [95% CI 0.607-0.992] respectively). Inductions were performed by medium-volume family physicians more often than by low-volume family physicians (adjusted OR 1.437 [95% CI 1.036-1.992].
interpretationFamily physicians' delivery volumes were not associated with adverse outcomes for mothers or newborns. Low-volume family physicians referred patients and transferred deliveries to obstetricians more frequently than high- or medium-volume family physicians. Further research is needed to validate these findings in smaller facilities, both urban and rural.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12041842PMC111076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.