Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12039820›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Mechanical methods of reducing blood transfusion in cardiac surgery: randomised controlled trial.

Neil McGill, Denise O'Shaughnessy, Ruth Pickering, Mike Herbertson, Ravi Gill

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Benefit from using recycling red blood cells in cardiovascular surgery.Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neil McGillC S Mott Children's Hospital, Section of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Room F3900, Box 0211, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0211, USA.
Denise O'Shaughnessy
Ruth Pickering
Mike Herbertson
Ravi Gill
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBC. S. Mott Children's Hospital · USHampton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of two mechanical methods of blood conservation in reducing the need for allogeneic red blood cells or coagulation products during cardiac surgery.

designRandomised controlled trial.

settingRegional cardiac centre in a teaching hospital in Southampton.

participants263 adults aged 18-80 years undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery entered the study, of whom 252 completed the trial. All patients received routine perioperative care. Patients were allocated to one of three treatment groups: intraoperative cell salvage, intraoperative cell salvage with acute perioperative normovolaemic haemodilution, or no mechanical blood conservation. There were 84 patients in each group.

main outcome measuresNumbers of patients who received allogeneic blood or coagulation products, and the mean number of units of blood transfused per patient.

resultsOf the patients in the intraoperative cell salvage group, 26 were given a transfusion of allogeneic blood, compared with 43 in the control group (odds ratio 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.80)). The mean number of units of allogeneic blood transfused per patient in the intraoperative cell salvage group was 0.68 units (SD=1.55), compared with 1.07 (1.56) units in the control group. 32 of the patients in the intraoperative cell salvage group were given any blood product, compared with 47 in the control group (odds ratio 0.47 (0.25 to 0.89); P=0.019). Combining acute perioperative normovolaemic haemodilution with intraoperative cell salvage conferred no additional benefits.

conclusionsAn intraoperative cell salvage device should be used in elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Pharmacological strategies may achieve further reductions in blood transfusions. Yet further reductions in blood transfusions could be achieved if the lower safe limit of haemoglobin concentration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery were known.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionCoronary Artery BypassAdolescentAdultAgedBlood CellsBlood Loss, SurgicalConfidence IntervalsHumansIntraoperative PeriodMiddle AgedOdds RatioTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID12039820
PMCPMC113763
OpenAlexW2025298959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.