Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12038871›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2002

Unlicensed and off-label drug use: issues and recommendations.

Sharon Conroy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Off-label drug use in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A literature review on off-label drug use in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2005
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The trials and tribulations of doing drug research in children.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sharon ConroyAcademic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom. sharon.conroy@nottingham.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most adult patients would expect to receive only medicines which have been shown to be well tolerated, effective, and of a high quality. The licensing process to which most drugs are subjected gives the best assurance available that these criteria are met. However, every day, children are required to take medicines which are either not licensed, or are being used outside the terms of their license. Consequently, we cannot be sure that they meet the high standards we require for adult patients. This situation exists wherever children are treated across the world, and when they are in hospital or treated at home. The drugs involved are not obscure; they are routinely used drugs, and many are the mainstay of pediatric therapeutics. The terms 'unlicensed' and 'off-label' should not be taken to imply disapproval, nor incorrect or improper use of drugs, as such prescribing is a vital part of everyday pediatric drug therapy. It is essential because the gold-standard randomized clinical trials supporting adult medicine are often unavailable for children's treatments. Adequate information is not available to ensure that children have timely access to well tolerated and effective medicines with accurate, scientifically justified prescribing information. Many problems arise from this situation, including the lack of availability of appropriate pediatric drug formulations, poor prescribing information, and increased risk of medication errors and unanticipated adverse drug reactions. This situation is unacceptable. The US has taken the lead to change this situation by providing legislation and incentives to the pharmaceutical industry to perform pediatric clinical trials. Funding has been provided to set up research facilities where trials can be conducted by experienced pediatric investigators using imaginative, innovative, and noninvasive testing methods. The rest of the world should learn from these experiences and follow this lead to ensure that children have the same rights as adults to well tolerated and effective medicines.

Indexed as

Drug LabelingDrug UtilizationLicensureAustraliaChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration RoutesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrugs, InvestigationalDrug TherapyEuropeHumansUnited StatesDrugs, Investigational

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.