ArticleJournal of human hypertension2002
Clinical evidence of dose-dependent interaction between aspirin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of low-dose aspirin on blood pressure and endothelial function of treated hypertensive hypercholesterolaemic subjects.Journal of human hypertension · 2005Trial
- A novel anti-inflammatory treatment for bradykinin-induced sore throat or pharyngitis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2021Article
- Antihypertensive effects of aspirin: what is the evidence?Current hypertension reports · 2010Review
- Systemic hypertension in postmenopausal women: a clinical approach.Current hypertension reports · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since coronary artery and cerebrovascular diseases are the most common serious complications of long standing hypertension, there is a great potential for combining treatment with aspirin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I). However, the data regarding interaction of aspirin and ACE-I in relation to blood pressure control and survival benefits are controversial and inconclusive. We presumed that the appearance of dry cough in some of the patients following initiation of ACE-I treatment could be used as a marker for the presence of their influence, whereas ACE-I cough attenuation after addition of aspirin to treatment could be a sign of aspirin and ACE-I interaction on clinical level. The present study was aimed to use ACE-I induced cough as a clinical marker of ACE-I activity to determine whether dose-dependent aspirin and ACE-I interaction does exist. In a cohort of 750 consecutive ACE-I treated hypertensive and postinfarction outpatients we identified 78 (10.4%) non-smoking ACE-I related coughers. Out of them, 31 (21 men, 10 women; mean age 61 +/- 0.9 years) agreed to take part in the study, which was aimed to compare two regimens of combined ACE-I and aspirin treatment (self-matched control data): intermediate (500 mg daily) vs low-dose aspirin (100 mg daily). On each visit the life quality, cough severity (CS, 0-4) and frequency (CF, 0-10) scores were registered. Low doses of aspirin demonstrated an excellent safety profile and did not influence any life quality score and ACE-I induced cough. In contrast, intermediate doses completely abolished cough in 17 patients and reduced coughing in other 11 patients. Cough severity and cough frequency scores decreased, respectively, from 2.7 +/- 1.1 to 0.7 +/- 1.2 (P < 0.001) and from 7.1 +/- 2.3 to 2.0 +/- 2.2 (P < 0.0001). Overall, the cough frequency score method alone could identify a clear modification of cough in 26 (84%) patients, and cough severity score method alone in 24 (77%). Using the combined frequency/severity score method a modification of cough could be identified in 28 (90%) of the patients receiving intermediate dose of aspirin. Aspirin did not influence heart rate and blood pressure control either in hypertensives or in postinfarction patients. We conclude that using ACE-I induced cough as a clinical marker of ACE-I activity demonstrates that an interaction between ACE-I and aspirin at 500 mg/day does exist. We did not find any evidence supporting the presence of a clinically significant interaction between ACE-I and aspirin at 100 mg/day. Thus, combined treatment by low dose aspirin and ACE-I seems to be both safe and useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.