ReviewPharmacoEconomics2002
Applications of economic models in healthcare: the introduction of pioglitazone in Sweden.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost effectiveness of preventive interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic literature review.PharmacoEconomics · 2006Pooled it
- The Cost-Effectiveness of an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System in People with Type 1 Diabetes: a Health Economic Analysis in Sweden.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump Therapy with Automated Insulin Suspension Versus Standard Insulin Pump Therapy in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes in Sweden.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017Article
- Review
- Reimbursement of glitazones in treatment of type 2 diabetes patients in Denmark in the context of a voluntary system for submitting pharmacoeconomic studies.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2004Article
- Cost effectiveness of combination therapy with pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus from a german statutory healthcare perspective.PharmacoEconomics · 2004Review
- The role of models within economic analysis: focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus.PharmacoEconomics · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common disorder that is estimated to affect approximately 100 million people worldwide. Forecasts have suggested a substantial increase in incidence, mainly in Asia, Africa and North America. Thus, an increasing number of people with diabetes-related complications will have to be cared for in the future. This development will be a major health problem for the people affected, as well as a major health economic challenge for many countries. Thiazolidinediones represent a new class of drugs with a novel mechanism of action that addresses the root cause of T2DM. Their mode of action targets the core defect of T2DM, namely, insulin resistance. One of these drugs, pioglitazone, was recently approved by the Swedish authorities. To evaluate the cost effectiveness of this new drug, a published mathematical simulation model was used. This model was adapted to Swedish conditions, and local Swedish unit costs were put into the model. Modelling is necessary when performing economic evaluations in diabetes because of the complexity of the disease and its long time horizon. The cost-effectiveness analyses showed that the cost per life-year gained with pioglitazone combination therapy compared with current treatment ranged from 37,000 Swedish kronor (SEK) to SEK149,000. Although there is no threshold value for cost effectiveness in Sweden, the values presented would normally be regarded as cost effective in the Swedish healthcare system. Modelling studies are a good starting point, but long-term naturalistic studies are needed to establish the cost effectiveness of these new drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.