ArticlePharmacoEconomics2002
Economic evaluation of pioglitazone hydrochloride in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost effectiveness of preventive interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic literature review.PharmacoEconomics · 2006Pooled it
- Cost-Utility Analysis of Low-Dose Pioglitazone in a Population With Prediabetes and a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Modeling Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Literature Review of Models, Data Sources, and Derivation Cohorts.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022Review
- When are Pharmaceuticals Priced Fairly? An Alternative Risk-Sharing Model for Pharmaceutical Pricing.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2020Article
- Modelling cost effectiveness of insulin glargine for the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes in Canada.PharmacoEconomics · 2007Article
- Review
- Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Role of thiazolidinediones.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2005Review
- Cost effectiveness of combination therapy with pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus from a german statutory healthcare perspective.PharmacoEconomics · 2004Review
- Postmarketing surveillance study of the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in general practice.Clinical drug investigation · 2003Article
- The role of models within economic analysis: focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus.PharmacoEconomics · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecently published clinical trial results have demonstrated that, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, treatment with pioglitazone hydrochloride as a first-line therapy can lead to significant improvements in glycosylated haemoglobin, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Given the results of these trials, we assessed the cost effectiveness of the use of pioglitazone as a first-line therapy in Canada.
methodsA Markov model was used to determine the health outcomes and economic impact for patients with type 2 diabetes, from the perspective of a provincial ministry of health. The model incorporated six complications of diabetes: hypoglycaemia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, lower extremity amputation, nephropathy, and retinopathy. Transition probabilities and costs were taken from published literature. Analysis compared treatment strategies with different first-line therapies: pioglitazone, glibenclamide (glyburide), metformin, and diet and exercise.
resultsCompared with other strategies, a pioglitazone-based strategy was estimated to reduce the cumulative incidence of severe clinical events and long-term complications by between 23 and 36% and to increase discounted life expectancy by between 0.13 and 0.35 life-years. The discounted incremental cost per life-year gained of a first-line pioglitazone-based strategy was 54,000 Canadian dollars ($Can) compared with metformin, $Can42,000 compared with glibenclamide and $Can27,000 compared with diet and exercise.
conclusionsWhen compared with other currently funded chronic therapy, these results demonstrate that a treatment strategy employing pioglitazone as a first-line therapy may be cost effective for certain patient strata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.