Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12032979›Full record

ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2002

Administrative, clinical, and ethical issues surrounding the use of waiting lists in the delivery of mental health services.

Seth A Brown, Jefferson D Parker, Phillip R Godding

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting Therapeutic Effects of Psychodiagnostic Assessment Among Children and Adolescents Participating in Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A preliminary investigation of wait times for child and adolescent mental health services in Canada.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seth A BrownDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard Street, Suite 551, Baltimore, MD 21201-1596, USA. sbrown@psych.umaryland.edu
Jefferson D Parker
Phillip R Godding

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The waiting list is commonly used in the delivery of mental health services. Despite their prevalence, their design and management are generally not standardized; rather, they take place on an ad hoc basis as a response to undesirable circumstances. The formulation and management of a waiting list initially appear to be simple, straightforward, and benign. However, on close examination, waiting lists are complicated, and implementation involves pervasive costs and benefits. This article delineates the costs and benefits involved in the use of waiting lists. It outlines administrative, clinical, and ethical issues intrinsic in the use of waiting lists and provides recommendations aimed at assisting in their design and management. While recommendations encompassing the range of possible unique situations are impractical, guidelines for consideration of important variables are provided.

Indexed as

EthicsWaiting ListsCost of IllnessHealth Care RationingHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesTriageUnited States

Identifiers

PMID12032979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.