Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12032771›Full record

ReviewOncogene2002

Hematopoietic cytokines, transcription factors and lineage commitment.

Jiang Zhu, Stephen G Emerson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Their Niche in Bone Marrow.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The role of GATA2 in adult hematopoiesis and cell fate determination.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiang ZhuDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA.
Stephen G Emerson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past two decades have witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the cellular physiology and molecular regulation of hematopoiesis. At the heart of stem cell self-renewal and lineage commitment decisions lies the relative expression levels of lineage-specific transcription factors. The expression of these transcription factors in early stem cells may be promiscuous and fluctuate, but ultimately comes under the influence of extracellular regulatory signals in the form of hematopoietic cytokines. In this review, we first summarize our current understanding of the phenotypic characterization of hematopoietic stem cells. Next, we describe key known transcription factors which govern stem cell self-renewal and lineage commitment decisions. Finally, we review data concerning the role of specific cytokines in influencing these decisions. From this review, a picture emerges in which stem cell fate decisions are governed by the integrated effects of intrinsic transcription factors and external signaling pathways initiated by regulatory cytokines.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell DifferentiationCell LineageCytokinesErythrocytesHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsModels, BiologicalMonocytesMyeloid CellsSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticCytokinesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12032771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.