Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12023496›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2002

Survival of breast cancer patients in Connecticut in relation to socioeconomic and health care access indicators.

Anthony P Polednak

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Socio-economic disparities in long-term cancer survival-10 year follow-up with individual patient data.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatial analysis of county-level breast cancer mortality in Texas.Journal of environmental and public health · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anthony P PolednakConnecticut Tumor Registry, State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health, Hartford 06134-0308, USA.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS N01-CN-67005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study of 16,931 black and white Connecticut women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 1988-1995 was to examine survival in relation to surrogate or proxy indicators of both socioeconomic status (SES) and access to primary care. Patients were followed through 1998, and the risk of death was elevated for the lowest (vs. highest) SES category independent of stage at diagnosis and other characteristics, especially among patients diagnosed before age 65 years. The health care access indicator was not associated with risk of death when other patient characteristics (including the SES variable and stage at diagnosis) were taken into account. Unexplained elevations, relative to the rest of the state, in risk of death were found for patients diagnosed while living in two of the state's four largest cities.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilitySocial ClassSurvival AnalysisAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsConnecticutFemaleHumansMedically Underserved AreaMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk AssessmentWhite People

Identifiers

PMID12023496
PMCPMC3456806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.