ArticleGenetics2002
Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection.
Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed.
- The rights and wrongs of rescaling in population genetics simulations.PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations in regulatory regions of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A model for background selection in non-equilibrium populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A model of Hill-Robertson interference caused by purifying selection in a nonrecombining genome.Genetics · 2025Article
- Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Article
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.Genetics · 2025Article
- FST and genetic diversity in an island model with background selection.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Population size rescaling significantly biases outcomes of forward-in-time population genetic simulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Biases in ARG-Based Inference of Historical Population Size in Populations Experiencing Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Background Selection From Unlinked Sites Causes Nonindependent Evolution of Deleterious Mutations.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The role of recombination dynamics in shaping signatures of direct and indirect selection across theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Effects of Selection at Linked Sites on Patterns of Genetic Variability.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2021Article
- Evolution of resistance under alternative models of selective interference.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2021Article
- Negative linkage disequilibrium between amino acid changing variants reveals interference among deleterious mutations in the human genome.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- The Impact of Purifying and Background Selection on the Inference of Population History: Problems and Prospects.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weakly selected mutations are most likely to be physically clustered across genomes and, when sufficiently linked, they alter each others' fixation probability, a process we call interference selection (IS). Here we study population genetics and evolutionary consequences of IS on the selected mutations themselves and on adjacent selectively neutral variation. We show that IS reduces levels of polymorphism and increases low-frequency variants and linkage disequilibrium, in both selected and adjacent neutral mutations. IS can account for several well-documented patterns of variation and composition in genomic regions with low rates of crossing over in Drosophila. IS cannot be described simply as a reduction in the efficacy of selection and effective population size in standard models of selection and drift. Rather, IS can be better understood with models that incorporate a constant "traffic" of competing alleles. Our simulations also allow us to make genome-wide predictions that are specific to IS. We show that IS will be more severe at sites in the center of a region containing weakly selected mutations than at sites located close to the edge of the region. Drosophila melanogaster genomic data strongly support this prediction, with genes without introns showing significantly reduced codon bias in the center of coding regions. As expected, if introns relieve IS, genes with centrally located introns do not show reduced codon bias in the center of the coding region. We also show that reasonably small differences in the length of intermediate "neutral" sequences embedded in a region under selection increase the effectiveness of selection on the adjacent selected sequences. Hence, the presence and length of sequences such as introns or intergenic regions can be a trait subject to selection in recombining genomes. In support of this prediction, intron presence is positively correlated with a gene's codon bias in D. melanogaster. Finally, the study of temporal dynamics of IS after a change of recombination rate shows that nonequilibrium codon usage may be the norm rather than the exception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.