Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12019085›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2002

Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment.

R Finch, D Schürmann, O Collins, R Kubin, J McGivern, H Bobbaers, J L Izquierdo, P Nikolaides, F Ogundare, R Raz and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Community-acquired pneumonia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Respiratory fluoroquinolones for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Pooled it
  6. Community-acquired pneumonia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2008
    Pooled it
  7. Efficacy and safety of sequential moxifloxacin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia associated with atypical pathogens.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2004
    Pooled it
  8. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2003
    Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Efficacy and safety of intravenous moxifloxacin versus cefoperazone with azithromycin in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2006
    Trial
  12. Moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate plus roxithromycin for nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia in adults with risk factors.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

R FinchNottingham City Hospital, Nottingham. Bayer plc, Newbury, United Kingdom. r.finch@nottingham.ac.uk
D Schürmann
O Collins
R Kubin
J McGivern
H Bobbaers
J L Izquierdo
P Nikolaides
F Ogundare
R Raz
P Zuck
G Hoeffken
Bayer (United Kingdom) · GBAHEPA University Hospital · GRBayer (Germany) · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEmek Medical Center · ILHospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ESNottingham City Hospital · GBUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present trial was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of moxifloxacin (400 mg) given intravenously (i.v.) once daily followed by oral moxifloxacin (400 mg) for 7 to 14 days with the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of co-amoxiclav (1.2 g) administered by i.v. infusion three times a day followed by oral co-amoxiclav (625 mg) three times a day, with or without clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily (i.v. or orally), for 7 to 14 days in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral therapy. A total of 628 patients were enrolled and assessed by evaluation of their clinical and bacteriological responses 5 to 7 days and 21 to 28 days after administration of the last dose of study medication. Although the trial was designed, on the basis of predefined outcomes, to demonstrate the equivalence of the two regimens, the results showed statistically significant higher clinical success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.4%, and for comparator regimen, 85.4%; difference [Delta], 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91 to 13.19%; P = 0.004) and bacteriological success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.7%, and for comparator regimen, 81.7%; Delta, 12.06%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 22.91%) for patients treated with moxifloxacin. This superiority was seen irrespective of the severity of the pneumonia and whether or not the combination therapy included a macrolide. The time to resolution of fever was also statistically significantly faster for patients who received moxifloxacin (median time, 2 versus 3 days), and the duration of hospital admission was approximately 1 day less for patients who received moxifloxacin. The treatment was converted to oral therapy immediately after the initial mandatory 3-day period of i.v. administration for a larger proportion of patients in the moxifloxacin group than patients in the comparator group (151 [50.2%] versus 57 [17.8%] patients). There were fewer deaths (9 [3.0%] versus 17 [5.3%]) and fewer serious adverse events (38 [12.6%] versus 53 [16.5%]) in the moxifloxacin group than in the comparator group. The rates of drug-related adverse events were comparable in both groups (38.9% in each treatment group). The overall incidence of laboratory abnormalities was similar in both groups. Thus, it is concluded that monotherapy with moxifloxacin is superior to that with a standard combination regimen of a beta-lactam and a beta-lactamase inhibitor, co-amoxiclav, with or without a macrolide, clarithromycin, in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a hospital.

Indexed as

Aza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesQuinolinesAdministration, OralAdultAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriaClarithromycinCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAza CompoundsClarithromycinFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID12019085
PMCPMC127227
OpenAlexW2134903735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.