ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2001
Breast cancer in the clinic: treatments past, treatments future.
Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- An in vivo imaging approach for simultaneously assessing tumor response and cytotoxicity-induced tissue response in chemotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Article
- Whole-body Imaging of Cell Death Provides a Systemic, Minimally Invasive, Dynamic, and Near-real Time Indicator for Chemotherapeutic Drug Toxicity.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019Article
- Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab, endostar and apatinib in transgenic and human lung cancer xenograftzebrafish model.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The molecular genetics of breast cancer and targeted therapy.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic options for the patient with systemic breast cancer were long limited to either chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. While these therapies provide palliation for many patients with advanced disease, and occasionally cure the patient with micrometastatic disease, they are not optimal either with regard to toxicity or efficacy. This paper reviews the past of systemic therapy (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), then discusses developing treatment strategies. These strategies include the recently introduced anti-HER-2 antibody trastuzumab, novel agents targeting other aspects of tumor growth mechanisms, as well as agents blocking angiogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.