Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12010888›Full record

ArticleGut2002

Genetic and clinical characterisation of familial adenomatous polyposis: a population based study.

A-L Moisio, H Järvinen, P Peltomäki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Genes · 2021
    Article
  9. Genetic predisposition in pediatric oncology.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tumor suppressor genes in familial adenomatous polyposis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A-L MoisioDepartment of Medical Genetics, Biomedicum Helsinki, PO Box 63, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. Anu-Liisa.Moisio@Helsinki.Fi
H Järvinen
P Peltomäki
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
INCIDENCE AND MOLECULAR SCREENING FOR HEREDITARY CANCERR01CA067941 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DE LA CHAPELLE, ALBERT · 2000 to 2004
$2.9M
PREDISPOSING/MODIFYING GENES IN HEREDITARY COLON CANCERR01CA082282 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PELTOMAKI, PAIVI T · 1999 to 2001
$483k
NATURAL HISTORY AND INCIDENCE OF HEREDITARY COLON CANCERU01CA067941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI · PI DE LA CHAPELLE, ALBERT · 1996 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA67941NCI NIH HHS CA82282NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA16058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067941NCI NIH HHS U01 CA067941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare autosomal dominantly inherited disease predisposing to colon cancer and caused by germline mutations in the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene.

aimsWe conducted a population based study to evaluate the prevalence and clinical implications of APC mutations among Finnish FAP kindreds. A possible founder effect in parallel with previous observations in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) was addressed. PATIENTS: Affected individuals from 65 kindreds were included.

methodsThe APC gene was screened for mutations using the protein truncation test and heteroduplex analysis. Haplotype analysis was performed with four flanking microsatellite markers. Families that failed to show any mutations were scrutinised with Southern blot hybridisation and allelic expression analysis.

resultsThirty eight different germline mutations in APC were identified in 47 kindreds (72%). The majority of these mutations were novel and unique to each family. Although sharing the classical polyposis phenotype, families without detectable APC mutations differed from mutation positive families in the following respects: firstly, mean age at polyposis diagnosis was higher (38.6 years (48 individuals) v 30.0 years (140 individuals); p=0.001); and secondly, the proportion of kindreds lacking extracolonic disease was higher (6/18 v. 5/47; p=0.04).

conclusionsOur results may pave the way for predictive testing in mutation positive families and should stimulate further molecular studies in mutation negative families. No founder effect was observed, which is in contrast with HNPCC in the same population.

Indexed as

Genes, APCAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdultAgedChi-Square DistributionDNA Mutational AnalysisExonsFemaleFounder EffectGenotypeGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedigreePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID12010888
PMCPMC1773245
OpenAlexW2130395124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.