Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12010606›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2002

Glucocorticoid use in rheumatoid arthritis.

Kenneth G Saag

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Understanding the major risk factors in the beginning and the progression of rheumatoid arthritis: current scenario and future prospects.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2015
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Glucocorticoid dose determines osteocyte cell fate.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kenneth G SaagDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs) of Musculoskeletal Disorders, University of Alabama at Birmingham, MEB 625, 1813 Sixth Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-3296, USA. ksaag@uab.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 50 years after their discovery, glucocorticoids continue to be a mainstay of treatment for many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although the short- and moderate-term efficacy of glucocorticoids in RA is seldom debated, increasing evidence favors a disease-modifying role of glucocorticoids. Despite renewed enthusiasm based on this newer long-term data, glucocorticoid use is marred substantially by the potential for many serious adverse events. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is one of the most predictable and serious complications for many chronic and some acute users. The correct identification of patients at high risk for bone complications and the institution of appropriate preventive measures may partially attenuate this adverse outcome.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidGlucocorticoidsHumansOsteoporosisGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.