Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12005421›Full record

ArticleThe journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society2001

Synthetic peptides from the N-domains of CEACAMs activate neutrophils.

K M Skubitz, K D Campbell, A P Skubitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of CEACAMs in neutrophil function.European journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  4. The emerging roles of CEACAM6 in human cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The life cycle of SARS coronavirus in Vero E6 cells.Journal of medical virology · 2004
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K M SkubitzDepartment of Medicine, The University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA. skkubi001@tc.umn.edu
K D Campbell
A P Skubitz
Palmetto Hematology Oncology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four members of the carcinoembryonic antigen family, CEACAM1, CEACAM8, CEACAM6 and CEACAM3, recognized by CD66a, CD66b, CD66c and CD66d monoclonal antibodies (mAb), respectively, are expressed on human neutrophils. CD66a, CD66b, CD66c and CD66d mAb binding to neutrophils triggers an activation signal that regulates the adhesive activity of CD11/CD18, resulting in an increase in neutrophil adhesion to human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Molecular modeling of CEACAM1 using IgG and CD4 as models has been performed, and three peptides from the N-terminal domain were found to increase neutrophil adhesion to human umbilical vein endothelial cell monolayers. The peptides were 14 amino acids in length and were predicted to be present at loops and turns between beta-sheets. To better understand the amino acid sequences critical for this biological activity, in the present study we examined the other neutrophil CEACAMs and the highly homologous CEACAM, CEA. Molecular modeling of the N-terminal domains of human CEACAM8, -6, -3 and CEA was performed. Twenty peptides, each 14 amino acids in length, that were homologous to the previously reported peptides from the N-domains of CEACAM1, were synthesized and tested for their ability to alter neutrophil adhesion. Only one new peptide, from the N-domain of CEA, was found to increase neutrophil adhesion, and this peptide differed from the corresponding CEACAM1 peptide by only a single conservative amino acid substitution. Importantly, minor amino acid differences between active and inactive homologous peptides suggest regions of these peptides that are critical for biological activity. The data suggest that the regions SMPF of peptide CD66a-1, QLFG of peptide CD66a-2 and NRQIV of peptide CD66a-3 are critical for the activities of these peptides, and for the native CEACAMs.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDAntigens, DifferentiationCarcinoembryonic AntigenCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCells, CulturedDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEndothelium, VascularHumansL-SelectinMacrophage-1 AntigenNeutrophil ActivationNeutrophilsPeptidesStructure-Activity RelationshipAntigens, CDAntigens, DifferentiationCarcinoembryonic AntigenCD66 antigensCell Adhesion MoleculesL-SelectinMacrophage-1 AntigenPeptides

Identifiers

PMID12005421
PMCPMC7162001
OpenAlexW2142782026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.