ArticleThe Histochemical journal
Immunogold confirmation that utrophin is localized to the normal position of dystrophin in dystrophin-negative transgenic mouse muscle.
Article in The Histochemical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential of utrophin and dystrophin combination therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Human molecular genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been shown previously that when utrophin is highly expressed in mice which lack dystrophin, the muscle pathology is prevented. Immunohistochemical evidence strongly suggests that utrophin in these transgenic mice occupies the position normally filled by dystrophin, although it is not possible to establish this firmly at the level of the light microscope. Using the higher resolution provided by the electron microscope, we demonstrate here by immunogold labelling with both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies that utrophin, in both its truncated and full-length forms, is indeed specifically located in the subcellular position usually occupied by dystrophin in normal muscle. Moreover, when double-labelling of utrophin and beta-dystroglycan was carried out, colocalisation of the two labels was often seen, indicating an association of the two proteins. Furthermore, when both utrophin and dystrophin were labelled in a transgenic line in which both were simultaneously expressed, the sites of both proteins were in the same zone in relation to the plasma membrane. When both proteins were present, the density of labelling of each was reduced compared with when they are expressed individually, suggesting that there is a finite number of binding sites. These results constitute further support for the view that utrophin might be therapeutically substituted for dystrophin in dystrophic muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.