Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12003748›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2002

The Spanish toxic oil syndrome 20 years after its onset: a multidisciplinary review of scientific knowledge.

Emilio Gelpí, Manuel Posada de la Paz, Benedetto Terracini, Ignacio Abaitua, Agustín Gómez de la Cámara, Edwin M Kilbourne, Carlos Lahoz, Bénoit Nemery, Rossanne M Philen, Luis Soldevilla and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The impact of toxic oil syndrome on physical and psychological health status using the HAQ and the PHQ-9 questionnaires.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Environmental Xenobiotic Exposure and Autoimmunity.Current opinion in toxicology · 2018
    Article
  15. Eosinophilia.Primary care · 2016
    Review
  16. [Mass poisoning events].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2015
    Review
  17. Environment, autoantibodies, and autoimmunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Toxicant-associated steatohepatitis.Toxicologic pathology · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilio GelpíInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel Posada de la Paz
Benedetto Terracini
Ignacio Abaitua
Agustín Gómez de la Cámara
Edwin M Kilbourne
Carlos Lahoz
Bénoit Nemery
Rossanne M Philen
Luis Soldevilla
Stanislaw Tarkowski
WHO/CISAT Scientific Committee for the Toxic Oil Syndrome. Centro de Investigación para el Síndrome del Aceite Tóxico
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1981, in Spain, the ingestion of an oil fraudulently sold as olive oil caused an outbreak of a previously unrecorded condition, later known as toxic oil syndrome (TOS), clinically characterized by intense incapacitating myalgias, marked peripheral eosinophilia, and pulmonary infiltrates. Of the 20,000 persons affected, approximately 300 died shortly after the onset of the disease and a larger number developed chronic disease. For more than 15 years, a scientific committee supported by the World Health Organization's Regional Office for Europe and by the Institute of Health Carlos III in Madrid has guided investigation intended to identify the causal agent(s), to assess toxicity and mode of action, to establish the pathogenesis of the disease, and to detect late consequences. This report summarizes advances in research on this front. No late mortality excess has been detected. Among survivors, the prevalence of some chronic conditions (e.g., sclerodermia, neurologic changes) is high. Attempts to reproduce the condition in laboratory animals have been unsuccessful, and no condition similar to TOS has been reported in the scientific literature. Laboratory findings suggest an autoimmune mechanism for TOS, such as high levels of seric soluble interleukin-2 receptor. Epidemiologic studies integrated with chemical analyses of case-related oils have shown that the disease is strongly associated with the consumption of oils containing fatty acid esters of 3-(N-phenylamino)-1,2-propanediol (PAP). These chemicals have also been found in oils synthesized under conditions simulating those hypothesized to have occurred when the toxic oil was produced in 1981. Whether PAP esters are simply markers of toxicity of oils or have the capability to induce the disease remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryChronic DiseaseEosinophiliaEpidemiologic StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung DiseasesMortalityMuscular DiseasesOlive OilPlant OilsPrevalencePropylene GlycolsResearch3-phenylamino-1,2-propanediolOlive OilPlant OilsPropylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID12003748
PMCPMC1240833
OpenAlexW1964278162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.