Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11999626›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2002

Electro-ophthalmological recovery after withdrawal from vigabatrin.

Hellen S Graniewski-Wijnands, Kors van der Torren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electroretinographic (ERG) responses in pediatric patients using vigabatrin.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2012
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Dose-related changes in retinal function and PKC-alpha expression in rabbits on vigabatrin medication. Effect of vigabatrin in the rabbit eye.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2009
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Changes in the electroretinogram resulting from discontinuation of vigabatrin in children.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2003
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hellen S Graniewski-WijnandsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. graniewski@wxs.nl
Kors van der Torren
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThis study describes the effects of stopping of the anti-epileptic drug vigabatrin on the visual field and electrophysiological changes in one third of the group of patients which is described in the paper 'Visual field and electrophysiological abnormalities due to vigabatrin' (Van der Torren and Graniewski, 2002). In 1997 several reports described the possible oculotoxic effect of vigabatrin followed by a reconsideration of this medication in epileptic patients. Vigabatrin was discontinued in one-third of the patients on chronic medication (mean duration 4.8 years). The visual field and electrophysiological examinations were repeated every 3 months if possible, otherwise at 6-month intervals. The EOG Arden index and the ERG rod b-wave showed a significant improvement when vigabatrin was discontinued. Repeated examinations of visual fields and electrophysiology shortly after discontinuation of the drug (between 1 and 3 months) and later on after 6 months and 1 year showed a recovery of the EOG Arden index and the ERG rod b-wave during this period. The visual fields did not change in either direction.

conclusionthe recovery effect is a strong argument for the hypothesis that the reduction in EOG and ERG b-wave is an oculotoxic effect. The electrophysiological improvement during 6 months or longer after discontinuation and the unchanged visual fields are an argument for the hypothesis that the visual field represents the irreversible intoxicating effect on the retina, whereas the electrophysiology represents a more direct effect on the retinal glial cells level.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsElectrooculographyElectroretinographyEpilepsyHumansRecovery of FunctionRetinaTime FactorsVigabatrinVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAnticonvulsantsVigabatrin

Identifiers

PMID11999626
OpenAlexW104680782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.