ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2002
Using a decade of data on medical student computer literacy for strategic planning.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, attitude, and perception of dental undergraduates towards mobile and digital learning methods in India: A cross-sectional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Measuring patrons' technology habits: an evidence-based approach to tailoring library services.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2014Article
- Computer literacy improvement needs: physicians' self assessment in the makkah region.Oman medical journal · 2013Article
- Computer literacy of physicians among the hospitals of Makkah region.Journal of family & community medicine · 2013Article
- Mobile technology use in medical education.Journal of medical systems · 2012Article
- Rapid access to information resources in clinical biochemistry: medical applications of Personal Digital Assistants (PDA).Clinical and experimental medicine · 2008Article
- Computer literacy and attitudes towards e-learning among first year medical students.BMC medical education · 2006Article
- The effect of computerized provider order entry on medical student clerkship experiences.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFrom 1991 through 2000, incoming medical students (M-Is) at the School of Medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University have been surveyed with a written questionnaire on their computer literacy. The survey's purpose is to learn the students' levels of knowledge, skill, and experience with computer technology to guide instructional services and facilities. METHODOLOGY: The questionnaire was administered during M-I orientation or mailed to students' homes after matriculation. It evolved from sixteen questions in 1991 to twenty-three questions in 2000, with fifteen questions common to all.
resultsThe average survey response rate was 81% from an average of 177 students. Six major changes were introduced based on information collected from the surveys and advances in technology: production of CD-ROMs distributed to students containing required computer-based instructional programs, delivery of evaluation instruments to students via the Internet, modification of the lab to a mostly PC-based environment, development of an electronic curriculum Website, development of computerized examinations for medical students to prepare them for the computerized national board examinations, and initiation of a personal digital assistant (PDA) project for students to evaluate PDAs' usefulness in clinical settings.
conclusionThe computer literacy survey provides a snapshot of students' past and present use of technology and guidance for the development of services and facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11999178PMC100765W1502845584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.